Who loses in the struggle between Moscow and Washington? Simple Russians
As Andrew Roth, the Washington Post journalist, explained last month, the reduction of the US representation in Russia by 755 people will not primarily affect American diplomats - for starters, there are not so many in the country. Instead, the cuts will fall on the support staff, most of whom are Russian citizens, the article says.
"For Russia, there is nothing new in responding to American measures to the detriment of its own citizens," the journalist said, recalling the response sanctions that banned the importation of a number of products to Russia and the ban on the adoption of Russian orphans by Americans.
"If you are interested in what Moscow can get, damaging the interests of its citizens, then it's worth considering how the story unfolded with American sanctions against Russia," the article reads."Thanks to sanctions, the Kremlin was able to gloss over its own wrong management in the economic sphere and lay the blame for all serious financial problems on the West." Against the backdrop of the country's reforms and the Russian economy recovering, Putin appeared on television, saying that the sanctions had actually done The country is stronger, "the newspaper writes.As Alexander Baunov of the Carnegie Moscow Center said on Monday, the Kremlin now regards sanctions as "a bleak inevitability that weakly correlates with the country's foreign policy behavior" - so why not raise the rate? Of course, the predicament of ordinary Russians is not taken into account, Taylor concludes.
Source: The Washington Post
Post a Comment